Categories
News Politics

Don’t let this “crisis” be another excuse to give away your rights

Have you seen this pattern before?

  1. The government enacts new laws that subvert natural behavior for the good of society
  2. The government waits for this subversion to create a crisis
  3. The government rushes in to trade your liberties for security from the crisis

We saw this pattern seven years ago. Leading up to 9/11, the government willfully ignored the threat of terrorism. I suppose the excuse was to keep people of the world happy with America. We wouldn’t want to upset other countries by responding to attacks by terrorists. Unfortunately, this timebomb went off in the most spectacular way. And many of us rushed to hand over out liberties to protect us from another attack.

We’re seeing it again. About 16 years ago, the government started enacting policy to force lenders to stop “discriminating” against high risk borrowers. They appealed to a sense of egalitarianism and argued that everyone deserved a chance to own their home. They made it so that it was impossible to be a lender and refuse to lend to people who obviously could never pay back the loans.

The fruit of this misguided vine began to ripen over the past year or so as we’ve seen defaults rise.  The government has been trying desperately to push back the tide with mountains of interference in the markets. In recent years they have been pushing the prime rate down in an effort to draw capital into the market and cover for mounting losses. Now we’ve reached the end of the line. The waiting is over and we’ve got the crisis.

Naturally, our most visible representatives of government, presidential candidates McCain and Obama, are offering the bargain that always comes in part three of this pattern. They spin a story about how businessmen have acted like gamblers, recklessly risking everything on higher profits. And now is the time, they say, when government must step in and take control. McCain went so far as to call for the firing of the head of the SEC, a position that the president cannot hire or fire. Furthermore, when both parties are offering the same solution with only degrees of severity to distinguish them, it’s likely they are wrong.

The people who need to get pink slips work in the House of Reprentatives and the Senate. They are the real source of this crisis. They pass the laws that screw up the natural market forces. They approved Greenspan and Bernake as successive chairmen of the Federal Reserve. It was under their watch that the Fed published guidelines such as Closing The Gap:A Guide To Equal Opportunity Lending. On page 15 of this document, there are the following guidelines for lenders, including this insane paragraph about sources of income (emphasis mine).

Sources of Income:  In addition to primary employment income, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will accept the following as valid income sources: overtime and part–time work, second jobs (including seasonal work), retirement and Social Security income, alimony, child support, Veterans Administration (VA) benefits, welfare payments, and unemployment benefits.

Any reasonable person would conclude that being on welfare or drawing unemployment is a sure sign of someone who will likely not be able to make mortgage payments!

What we desperately need now is a swift pullback of control of the markets. Losers need to fail now, more than ever. We should not be swayed by the creators of crisis offering to bail us out. We should not believe them when they say, “we just need to suspend the constitution until we fix this.”

Categories
News

On Clear Night Sky: Zend Partners with Adobe

Last Tuesday Andi Gutmans announced that Zend was partnering with Adobe to get PHP and Flex working better with each other. I wrote an analysis on the Clear Night Sky blog.

Read the entire post on CNS.

Categories
Politics

Palin detractors insult dads when they criticize her pursuit of a career

There’s a meme being tossed around as a criticism of Sarah Palin, runningmate to John McCain in the upcoming presidential election. The idea is that since Palin is a mother with a family, she shouldn’t be spending time in politics. This is the type of rhetoric we used to laugh at when I was growing up in the 1980s as old fashioned, conservative thinking. It’s remarkable that these criticisms are coming from Obama supporters who must be self-described liberals.

The insult to women is obvious. Michelle Malkin launched an attack on the media who would continue this line of argument while failing to question the many successful mothers we see every day on news programs.

What struck me is the implied insult to fathers packaged up in this meme. When I was growing up, the culture typicall accepted that fathers spent their time working, came home expecting dinner and flopped down in front of the TV for the rest of the evening. Mother’s took care of raising the kids, preparing meals, cleaning house. A mom was liberated if she had a job in addition to all of this.

It doesn’t work that way any more.

Every father I know works his ass off participating in the family. Yes, most of us have full time jobs, but we come home to help out with the cooking, cleaning and nuturing. Perhaps it’s just the crowd I associate with, but we understand that being a father includes getting up in the middle of the night to change a diaper. And if my wife is busy with some other obligation, I am perfectly capable of caring for our two little kids.

When I hear the argument that Sarah Palin’s family is somehow suffering for lack of attention from her, it implies that any contribution from her husband is discounted. Futhermore, it implies that fathers, in general, make no contribution. We do.

I am proud that made it through washing out cloth diapers in the toilet! There’s hardly a more macho job for a dad than dealing with the dirtiest jobs. Ultimately, it’s this meme that ought to be flushed down the drain.

Categories
News

A Demonstration of the Virtue of Persistence

The War Within by Bob Woodward

Bob Woodward recently wrote a book, The War Within, that chronicles what was going on in the White House in the past couple years. I haven’t read it, but I read excerpts on in Robert Tracinski’s TIA Daily newsletter which made me feel proud and inspired. This will be shocking to my friends in the Bay Area, but the subject of my admiration is President Bush.

To be clear, our president has weaknesses, as do we all. His crowd of detractors is legion, and it is unnecessary for me to call them out. But he does have one great virtue: persistence. He doesn’t give up when he knows he’s right. When I read the account of how much opposition he faced to the surge and how he reacted to it, it inspired me provide that kind of leadership and it set an image in my mind of the kind of leadership I want.

Here’s an account of how Retired Army Gen. Jack Keane delivered a message from President Bush to Gen. David H. Petraeus.

Keane took out the piece of paper and read the president’s message, verbatim, aloud to Petraeus:

“I respect the chain of command. I know that the Joint Chiefs and the Pentagon have some concerns. One is about the Army and Marine Corps and the impact of the war on them. And the second is about other contingencies and the lack of strategic response to those contingencies.

“I want Dave to know that I want him to win. That’s the mission. He will have as much force as he needs for as long as he needs it.

“When he feels he wants to make further reductions, he should only make those reductions based on the conditions in Iraq that he believes justify those reductions. These two concerns that we are discussing back here in Washington—about contingency operations and the needs of the Army and the Marine Corps—they are not your concerns. They are my concerns.

“I do not want to change the strategy until the strategy has succeeded. I waited over three years for a successful strategy. And I’m not giving up on it prematurely. I am not reducing further unless you are convinced that we should reduce further.”

I am convinced the essence of leadership is to set the destination, to congratulate the team when they cross the finish line and in all other times provide humble service to the people who are getting the job done. We didn’t read about it in the papers at the time, but Bush was providing exactly that type of leadership.

I run the technology department at a small business that provides leadership in digital marketing strategy. I’ve managed larger teams than I am now–we’re in a period where we have a solid strategy and things are looking much better than they did six months ago. Every day, I strive to keep the team supplied with billable work and the tools they need to produce excellent work. Likewise, my bosses allow me to be successful by pointing to where they want the company to go and then getting out of my way.

So often we are dissatisfied with government and politicians. It’s amazing to find shining moments of leadership in places where the stakes are so much higher.

Categories
News

On Clear Night Sky: The market for Internet skills

I just posted to Clear Ink’s company blog: The market for Internet skills. The post is about the market for skills on Elance, the ratio of developers to open projects and how it might affect your choice of technology–whether you’re a provider or a consumer.